Peer review is the cornerstone of academic writing and publishing. That means most scholars will inevitably experience being on both the giving and receiving end of reviewer comments.
Despite this commonality, many aspects of the process can be confusing and misunderstood.
We’ve gathered some of our favorite peer review resources to shed some light on this scholarly practice and how we can make it better.
These articles will help you write better reviews and use the reviews you receive more productively.
They can also help you reflect on the peer review system as a whole, imagining ways the process can be more sustainable, equitable, and generous.
Peer review resources for reviewers
How to write a peer review report without being a jerk
by
Myths and misconceptions about academic peer review
by
Peer review resources for authors
Responding to reader reports: The big picture
by
Responding to reader reports: The details
by
Understanding conference and journal article rejection
by
Re-imagining peer review
Crisis standards of peer review
by
Feminist futures of peer review
A panel discussion featuring Josen Masangkay Diaz, April Petillo, Dolores Inés Casillas, and Cathy Hannabach
Share this:
